DeLauro uses new post to probe Trumps impact on Obamacare

DeLauro uses new post to probe Trumps impact on Obamacare
Record Journal
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Rep. Rosa DeLauro has wasted no time using her new clout to tackle something she considers an outrage — the Trump administration’s impact on the Affordable Care Act.

The Democratic takeover of the U.S. House has promoted DeLauro to the chairmanship of a House Appropriations subcommittee with jurisdiction over the budget of the Department of Health and Human Services.

While the panel has limited direct jurisdiction over the ACA, DeLauro held a hearing in the subcommittee on Wednesday on the “Impact of the Administration’s Policies Affecting the Affordable Care Act.”

To DeLauro and most of her Democratic colleagues, the steps the Trump administration has taken to change the health care law has spurred an increase in premiums and a drop in the numbers of insured people.

“Its impact has exceeded expectations,” DeLauro said of the ACA. “It has slowed the rising cost of health care and 20 million have gained coverage.”

Then the Trump administration “went to work,” DeLauro said, “increasing premiums and out-of-pocket costs.”

President Donald Trump and his Republican allies counter that the ACA has made health insurance more expensive by requiring insurers to offer a wide range of coverage and by shifting some of the cost of insuring the very sick to others. They say allowing states to offer cheaper, less comprehensive short-term plans are one way they are trying to help those who purchase individual policies, but don’t receive ACA subsidies to help pay their premiums.

The top Republican on the subcommittee, Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma, said his state has struggled to persuade insurers to participate in its ACA marketplace.

“One insurance company (in the marketplace) is not a choice. Two insurance companies are barely a choice,” Cole said.

Republicans on the panel invited as their witness Ed Haislmaier, senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative group that has pressed for the repeal of the ACA.

Haislmaier said that by expanding Medicaid and requiring insurers to offer coverage to all, including the sickest Americans, the ACA has increased the price of coverage and made state marketplaces like Access Health CT unappealing to insurers.

“The big brand-name insurers, the Aetnas …the Cignas, are gone (from the ACA marketplaces) and are not coming back,” Haislmaier said.

Meanwhile, a defender of the ACA, Aviva Aron-Dine of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said there are ways to bring premiums down, including the restoration of a reinsurance program that spreads risks among insurers, and making the ACA’s premium tax subsidies available to those who earn more than 400 percent of the federal poverty income level, which is the program’s current cap.

Before she gaveled in her first hearing as a subcommittee chairman, DeLauro said her intention is to bring attention to what she says is Trump’s campaign to gut the ACA and find ways to reverse the administration’s initiatives.

“One of the most critical issues that we are facing is the issue of health care,” DeLauro said.

One thing that’s possible, DeLauro said, is for the Democratic-controlled Appropriations Committee to restore funding to an ACA program that pays to advertise the state marketplaces and for outreach that boosts enrollment.

Sarah Locke

View posts by Sarah Locke
Online Manager
Scroll to top